Crane Kalman

PRESS

Around the Galleries: Lowry's progress backwards.

The Times - 08 December 2012

Exhibitions

The Spectator - 29 November 2012

We should not be shocked that Lowry had a dark side. He was after all, an artist.

The Independent - 16 November 2012

A glimpse of lesser known Lowrys

The Daily Telegraph - 06 November 2012

Sir Ian McKellen: My Lifelong passion for LS Lowry

The Telegraph - 23 April 2011

The dark side of the matchstick man

The Mail on Sunday - 16 April 2011

Naive? Eccentric? More an unlikely modernist

Financial Times - 07 December 2010

Liberation in Paint

Financial Times - 05 June 2010

James Fitton RA: A Very English Painter

The Spectator - 04 December 2004

Exhibitions: Lowry, the Magician

The Spectator - 25 October 2003

Parkinson the Art Lover, Collector Profile

The Daily Telegraph - 24 September 2001

Brave New Worlds

The Spectator - 26 August 2000

A Simple Message Hits Home - Alfred Wallis and Patrick Hayman

Financial Times - 09 May 1999

Sutherland brings home the Bacon

Financial Times - 08 May 1999

Truly Original and Entirely Innocent - Mary Newcomb and Alfred Wallis

Financial Times - 29 March 1997

Winifred Nicholson and her Circle

The Spectator - 13 June 1987

 

Around the Galleries, Lowrys progress backwards.

Posthumus selections of work from the studios of deceased artists often raise as many questions as they answer, John Russell Taylor writes. Did the works remain in their creator’s possession because he was particularly fond of them, or because they were simply stuff he could not sell, or – perhaps worse – would never even consider selling? In the case of the paintings and drawings from the estate of L S Lowry on show at Crane Kalman, the answer seems to be a bit of each.

There are one or two torn and crumpled drawings that he would never have considered saleable but are interesting in documenting Lowry’s development. There are some later drawings in his most childlike style, sometimes highly finished, that his former dealers would probably not have considered saleable because they clearly do not conform to the conventional ‘matchstick men’ image of his art.

More intriguing are three or four of his ‘fetishistic drawings of young women. He took particular interest in high heels, tight lacing, torturously high collars and bizarre and extravagant hairstyle, all shown off on young and attractive women. Those who look at Lowry for a few unallowable thrills will probably to disappointed, however. These pieces are fringe-pornographic in much the same way as some of Fuseli’s drawings. There are matchstick men in plenty – and even more of his mysteriously monochromatic pure landscapes and seascapes, where pigment roughly the colour and consistency of porridge is somehow manipulated into a vivid likeness of wind-whipped waves, or smoothed into an apparently featureless hillock. The other absorbing aspect of this show is what it reveals about Lowry’s development. This proves here to be curiously backwards. Lowry ended, in the opinion of the world, as some sort of wise primitive, painting in a fashion one would have to call childlike, if not childish. So it may well come as a surprise to discover that he was conventionally trained in several art schools, and could paint capably enough in a post-Turks tradition if he wanted to. 

 

info@cranekalman.com - 020 7584 7566
178 Brompton Road, London SW3 1HQ